Global Navigation Skip to Page Navigation.

Professor Alexandra Navrotsky

EMS 298 / PHY 298 Possible Discussion Topics

Discussion Questions

  1. Do we only think of ethics in terms of bad things?
  2. Deciding authorship and its order
  3. What to do when you find an error or inconsistency in previous data, especially in your own group
  4. How does one archive data and procedures to document and re-create what was done?
  5. What is your responsibility in helping non-English speaker and other non-acculturated people, both in your own group and when reviewing papers?
  6. What are your responsibilities in general in helping others?
  7. How do you properly give others credit for contributing to the work?
  8. What are appropriate references in a paper?
  9. Plagiarism, paraphrasing, copying
  10. Does Science Citation Index cause people to do things that are not ethical or poor scientific practice?
  11. What is the role of graduate students in grant writing? What benefits should graduate students receive from helping write a proposal?
  12. How much information can you share (computer codes, samples)? How do you give proper credit?
  13. How openly can you discuss new ideas in grant proposals and job interviews?
  14. Pros and cons for anonymous reviews
  15. Responsibilities as a reviewer
  16. Conflicts of interest -- monetary and intellectual
  17. Fair and unfair competition
  18. Proposal strategy
  19. Responsibilities for managing grant money
  20. Directed versus free-flowing research
  21. Awards and prizes -- politics and ethics
  22. Waste and pollution -- our responsibilities
  23. Internet and World Wide Web ethics
  24. Dealing with the press; communicating to society at large
  25. Science as a force for good or evil in the world